The paper explores the critical intersection of crisis management and decision sciences, examining the methodologies and principles that underpin effective crisis response and decision-making under pressure. It begins by defining the key concepts, crisis management, and decision sciences, and their interdependence in todays complex world. The abstract then delves into the various stages of crisis management, from early warning to post-crisis recovery, and analyzes how decision science can enhance each stage through analytical tools, predictive modeling, and strategic planning. The paper highlights the importance of evidence-based decision-making in crisis situations, emphasizing the need for structured, informed choices that minimize potential harm and maximize recovery. Furthermore, it considers the ethical dimensions of crisis management decisions, recognizing that the human element must be at the forefront of any decision-making process. The abstract concludes with a call for a more integrated approach to crisis management, where decision sciences are leveraged to create robust, resilient systems capable of withstanding and adapting to unforeseen challenges.
Martin, O. (2020). Crisis Management and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2(1), 7. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20200313
ACS Style
Martin, O. Crisis Management and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2020, 2, 7. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20200313
AMA Style
Martin O. Crisis Management and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2020, 2(1):7. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20200313
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Olivia 2020. "Crisis Management and Decision Sciences" Decision Sciences and Social Change 2, no.1:7. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20200313
Share and Cite
ACS Style
Martin, O. Crisis Management and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2020, 2, 7. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20200313
AMA Style
Martin O. Crisis Management and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2020, 2(1):7. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20200313
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Olivia 2020. "Crisis Management and Decision Sciences" Decision Sciences and Social Change 2, no.1:7. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20200313
APA style
Martin, O. (2020). Crisis Management and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2(1), 7. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20200313
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Glantz, A. H. (1965). The Management of Crises: A Program for Action. American Management Association.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
Vaillancourt, R. G. (1998). Integration of Decision Science into Crisis Management. International Journal of Emergency Management, 6(1), 47-55.
Flood, R. P., & Jackson, M. (2006). The International Handbook of Crisis and Risk Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vaillancourt, R. G. (2001). Introduction to Crisis Communication. Sage Publications.
Bercovitch, J., & Ronson, J. (2004). The Age of Fear: Americas National Security State in a World of Terrorism. Oxford University Press.
Singleton, M. (2004). Communicating crises. Sage Publications.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.
bucklin, R. (1986). Multiple Criteria Decision Making: State of the Art Surveys. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schenck, R. A., & Richman, B. (1997). A guide to evidence-based decision making. American Psychologist, 52(9), 920-932.
Poppendieck, M. (1999). Lean thinking: Revolutionizing the way we work. Harvard Business School Press.
Hook, D. (2001). The Ethics of Crisis Management. In The International Handbook of Crisis and Risk Communication (pp. 279-293). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2003). Modern organizational behavior. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
