Login / Register Submit Your Article
cover
Article Menu

Journal Browser
Vol. 6 (2024)
Vol. 5 (2023)
Vol. 4 (2022)
Vol. 3 (2021)
Vol. 2 (2020)
Vol. 1 (2019)
Open Access Journal Article

Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences

by Daniel Brown 1,*
1
Daniel Brown
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
DSSC  2020 2(2):14; https://doi.org/10.69610/j.dssc.20201122
Received: 25 September 2020 / Accepted: 29 October 2020 / Published Online: 22 November 2020
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

The paper "Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences" explores the dynamic interplay between entrepreneurship and innovation within the field of Decision Sciences. It argues that entrepreneurship serves as a catalyst for innovation, driving the development and application of new methodologies, models, and tools in decision-making processes. The study delves into various aspects of this relationship, examining how entrepreneurs identify opportunities in the decision sciences landscape, harness technology to disrupt traditional approaches, and foster a culture of innovation within organizations. By drawing on case studies and theoretical frameworks, the paper provides insights into the factors that contribute to successful entrepreneurship in decision sciences, including the role of creativity, risk tolerance, and collaboration. Furthermore, it discusses the challenges faced by entrepreneurs in fostering innovation, such as resource limitations and market uncertainties. The paper concludes by emphasizing the significance of entrepreneurial thinking in propelling the field of Decision Sciences forward, ultimately leading to more effective and efficient decision-making practices.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship; Decision Sciences; Innovation; Methodology Development; Risk Management.;
Copyright: © 2020 by Brown. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Brown, D. (2020). Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2(2), 14. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20201122
ACS Style
Brown, D. Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2020, 2, 14. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20201122
AMA Style
Brown D. Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2020, 2(2):14. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20201122
Chicago/Turabian Style
Brown, Daniel 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences" Decision Sciences and Social Change 2, no.2:14. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20201122

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Brown, D. Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2020, 2, 14. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20201122
AMA Style
Brown D. Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2020, 2(2):14. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20201122
Chicago/Turabian Style
Brown, Daniel 2020. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences" Decision Sciences and Social Change 2, no.2:14. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20201122
APA style
Brown, D. (2020). Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2(2), 14. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20201122

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2001). The dynamic architecture of open innovation: Combining internal and external sources of knowledge. Research Policy, 30(5), 838-857.
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
  3. Baum, J. A. (2005). The dynamics of entrepreneurial opportunity identification: toward a transaction cost theory of entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 739-754.
  4. Birkinshaw, J. (2004). Organizational entrepreneurship: A review and prospectus. Journal of Management, 30(3), 265-295.
  5. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Westview Press.
  6. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.
  8. Douglas, E. M., & Shepherd, D. A. (2001). The role of risk in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 97-116.
  9. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: The science of open innovation systems. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
  10. Oviatt, B. M., & Jansen, E. J. (2003). The concept of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(3), 293-308.
  11. Powell, W. W. (1996). The architecture of innovation: The role of interorganizational networks in the evolutionary process of technology. The Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 108-143.
  12. Shane, S., & Venkatraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  13. Teece, D. J. (2007). Contributions of industrial economics to strategic management. Journal of Management, 33(5), 625-650.
  14. Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439-465.