The abstract of the paper "Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making" delves into the critical examination of ethical considerations surrounding the decision-making processes of artificial intelligence (AI). As AI becomes increasingly integrated into various sectors, including healthcare, finance, and transportation, the ethical implications of its decisions have come under scrutiny. This paper argues that while AI has the potential to revolutionize decision-making with its speed and efficiency, it also poses significant ethical challenges. It explores the ethical principles that should guide AI decision-making, such as fairness, transparency, accountability, and human rights. The paper further discusses the complexities of addressing these ethics in practice, including the issues of bias, algorithmic transparency, and the potential for AI to make decisions that may be harmful to individuals or society. Finally, it proposes frameworks for ethical governance and the role of stakeholders in ensuring that AI is used responsibly.
Anderson, E. (2021). Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 3(1), 19. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210522
ACS Style
Anderson, E. Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2021, 3, 19. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210522
AMA Style
Anderson E. Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2021, 3(1):19. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210522
Chicago/Turabian Style
Anderson, Emily 2021. "Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making" Decision Sciences and Social Change 3, no.1:19. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210522
Share and Cite
ACS Style
Anderson, E. Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2021, 3, 19. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210522
AMA Style
Anderson E. Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2021, 3(1):19. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210522
Chicago/Turabian Style
Anderson, Emily 2021. "Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making" Decision Sciences and Social Change 3, no.1:19. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210522
APA style
Anderson, E. (2021). Ethics in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 3(1), 19. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210522
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Wiener, N. (1950). The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Houghton Mifflin.
Shaw, A., Aydin, I., & Toder, E. (2018). Algorithmic bias in the criminal justice system: Detecting, diagnosing, and mitigating unfairness. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Simon & Schuster.
O'Hara, K. (2005). Accountability in artificial intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 259-268.
Johnson, M. A. (1993). Information technologies and human rights. Journal of Information Ethics, 2(1), 15-26.
Hansson, S. O. (2010). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In S. O. Hansson (Ed.), The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1-17). Springer.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Solove, D. J. (2018). The ethics of artificial intelligence. Stanford Law Review, 70(5), 1411-1451.
Malina, O. (2014). The governance of artificial intelligence: Embedding ethical considerations into the regulatory process. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 424-447.
Schölkopf, B., Sonnenburg, S., & Rätsch, G. (2017). Learning with kernels. MIT Press.
Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine learning. McGraw-Hill.
Autor, D. H. (2015). The rise of skill premia: The rest of the story. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 21-44.
Marx, G. (2015). The ethics of autonomous weapons. Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 20(1), 1-24.
