Family Dynamics and Decision Sciences is a comprehensive examination of the intricate relationships and decision-making processes within familial structures. This paper delves into the theoretical frameworks and empirical studies that explore the various factors influencing family dynamics, such as communication patterns, power dynamics, and emotional expression. The role of decision sciences is highlighted, with a focus on how families navigate complex choices, including financial planning, education, and health care. The paper discusses the importance of understanding family systems in order to develop effective strategies for intervention and support. By integrating insights from psychology, sociology, and economics, this study provides a holistic view of family dynamics and decision-making, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary research to fully comprehend the multifaceted nature of familial relationships and the decision-making processes that shape them.
Harris, D. (2021). Family Dynamics and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 3(2), 21. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210821
ACS Style
Harris, D. Family Dynamics and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2021, 3, 21. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210821
AMA Style
Harris D. Family Dynamics and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2021, 3(2):21. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210821
Chicago/Turabian Style
Harris, David 2021. "Family Dynamics and Decision Sciences" Decision Sciences and Social Change 3, no.2:21. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210821
Share and Cite
ACS Style
Harris, D. Family Dynamics and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2021, 3, 21. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210821
AMA Style
Harris D. Family Dynamics and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2021, 3(2):21. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210821
Chicago/Turabian Style
Harris, David 2021. "Family Dynamics and Decision Sciences" Decision Sciences and Social Change 3, no.2:21. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210821
APA style
Harris, D. (2021). Family Dynamics and Decision Sciences. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 3(2), 21. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20210821
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
George, A. L., & Maccoby, E. E. (1966). Family therapy: An approach to casework. New York: Basic Books.
Buehler, C., & Markman, H. J. (2004). Communication in marriage. In D. S. Buss & N. M. conditioned (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 639-659). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gelles, R. J. (1995). Theories of domestic violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Talcott, C. (2001). Power, family relations, and social exchange: A model of family decision-making. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(1), 37-49.
Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2006). Judgment in management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Lewicki, R. J., Bies, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1985). The dynamics of ethical decision making in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 434-448.
Peterson, C., & Van Bavel, J. (2005). The family decision-making process: Integrating psychological and social perspectives. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(1), 5-26.
Kashy, D. A., & Buehler, C. (2005). Family functioning and decision-making. In C. Buehler & D. A. Kashy (Eds.), Family decision making (pp. 31-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Markman, H. J., Stanley, S. M., & Blumberg, S. L. (2003). Fighting for your marriage: Positive steps for making your relationship last. New York: Viking.
