The decision-making process is a complex cognitive activity that involves several psychological factors. This paper delves into the various psychological elements that influence decision-making, exploring how they shape our choices and outcomes. It examines the role of cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and overconfidence, and how they can lead to suboptimal decisions. Additionally, the paper investigates the impact of emotional factors, including stress and optimism bias, on decision-making. Furthermore, it discusses the role of social influences, such as conformity and groupthink, on individual decision-making processes. By analyzing these psychological factors, this study aims to provide insights into the intricacies of decision-making and offer strategies to enhance decision quality.
Smith, D. (2022). Psychological Factors in Decision Making Processes. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 4(2), 34. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20221114
ACS Style
Smith, D. Psychological Factors in Decision Making Processes. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2022, 4, 34. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20221114
AMA Style
Smith D. Psychological Factors in Decision Making Processes. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2022, 4(2):34. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20221114
Chicago/Turabian Style
Smith, Daniel 2022. "Psychological Factors in Decision Making Processes" Decision Sciences and Social Change 4, no.2:34. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20221114
Share and Cite
ACS Style
Smith, D. Psychological Factors in Decision Making Processes. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 2022, 4, 34. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20221114
AMA Style
Smith D. Psychological Factors in Decision Making Processes. Decision Sciences and Social Change; 2022, 4(2):34. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20221114
Chicago/Turabian Style
Smith, Daniel 2022. "Psychological Factors in Decision Making Processes" Decision Sciences and Social Change 4, no.2:34. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20221114
APA style
Smith, D. (2022). Psychological Factors in Decision Making Processes. Decision Sciences and Social Change, 4(2), 34. doi:10.69610/j.dssc.20221114
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430-454.
Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Johnson, M. P. (1973). Inaccuracies in judgment of probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 27-41.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
Baron, J., & Brown, D. J. (2001). Overconfidence in investment and voting: Experiments on overconfidence and social influence. In G. S. Loewenstein, L. L. Thompson, & E. J. Zuckerman (Eds.), Advances in experimental economics (pp. 53-89). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-288.
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and convergent thinking effects in group situations. In L. B. Smith (Ed.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 406-424). New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
